In India, the question of whether Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) graduates can rightfully use the title “Dr.” continues to spark debate. While many believe dentists deserve the title due to their extensive education and training, others argue that it should be reserved solely for those with a formal medical degree. Let’s explore the legal background, arguments from both perspectives, and the role of regulatory bodies to better understand this ongoing issue.
Legal Context: Indian Medical Council Act, 1956
The controversy primarily stems from the Indian Medical Council Act of 1956, which states that only individuals with recognized medical qualifications are allowed to use the title “Dr.” Under this definition, dentists, who hold a BDS degree rather than an MBBS or equivalent, are technically excluded. As a result, some members of the medical community argue that only licensed medical doctors should use the prefix, to maintain professional boundaries and prevent public confusion.
Opponents of allowing dentists to use the "Dr." title raise concerns about potential misunderstandings among patients—particularly in emergency situations. They argue that without clear regulations, unqualified practitioners might misuse the title, eroding public trust and potentially endangering patients. Additionally, societal norms in India have traditionally linked the “Dr.” title exclusively with medical doctors, making it culturally sensitive.
Support for BDS Graduates Using “Dr.”
On the other side of the debate, many believe that BDS graduates are fully justified in using the title. Their curriculum includes substantial medical and clinical training, which prepares them to diagnose and treat a range of oral and dental health conditions. Supporters argue that acknowledging this expertise with the “Dr.” prefix would help elevate the profession’s standing and attract more talent to the field.
Furthermore, the Dental Council of India (DCI)—the governing body for dental education and practice—recognizes international degrees such as Doctor of Dental Medicine (DMD) and Doctor of Dental Surgery (DDS) as valid and equivalent to BDS. This recognition adds legitimacy to dentists using the “Dr.” title, particularly when it is clearly associated with dental practice.
Regulatory Oversight: Role of the DCI
The Dental Council of India plays a crucial role in this matter. According to DCI regulations, dentists holding recognized qualifications and registered with the council are permitted to use the title “Dr.” However, this is conditional upon compliance with professional standards and ethical practices to ensure transparency and avoid misleading patients.
Conclusion
The debate over whether BDS graduates in India should use the title “Dr.” is nuanced, with valid points raised on both sides. While acknowledging dentists with the “Dr.” prefix may boost the credibility and visibility of the profession, concerns about public confusion and misuse of the title must be carefully managed.
Ultimately, any resolution should balance professional recognition with patient safety, public trust, and strict adherence to legal and regulatory frameworks.